1/29/2024 0 Comments Music obscurity test![]() Food can be a major pain point for people with a variety of different medical conditions, because the “picky eating” that people identify pejoratively-which can include food allergies, migraine triggers, sensory aversions, and eating disorders-is often held up as a sign of immaturity or petulance in popular culture. You may know about ableism, which is discrimination against people based on both visible and invisible disabilities. The researchers explain their work: “Validity was supported by correlational analysis between the revised version of the Disgust Scale, germ aversion, food neophobia, picky eating, and individuals’ number of food-borne illnesses in the last five years.” Their metric also held up to a repeated exercise two weeks apart. ![]() So if the purpose is not necessarily in the specific science of what’s causing the disgust, what’s the goal of a metric like this? Making a clear metric that holds up to scientific rigor and creates a measurement over time can help anyone who seeks to study food disgust. Researchers Make Food From Poop and Bacteria.The decay at play is probably more related to the sugar and water content of those foods than how we categorize them on a grocery store receipt. But some decaying vegetables may come to mind that are fruits in the technical sense, and there are fruits that are more aligned with what we think of as vegetables. I’m not trying to be pedantic about daily language. Fish are animals, so does animal flesh technically include fish flesh? Does the word fish mean all seafood? Decaying fruit is imprecise when the word “fruit” itself is more of a usage category, not a scientific idea. Some things about this list jumped out at me right away to say that this scale is meant to be measurable of human reactions while not being very precise in terms of food categories. Here are the sub-scales, or types of disgust, that the researchers did choose to amalgamate into the FDS: The researchers express that their aim is to study disgust as “universally” as possible. A measurement where maybe 25 percent believe something is taboo because of their upbringing arguably is a measure of upbringing rather than disgust. That makes sense in terms of sensitivity to the world’s many cultures and religions, but it also makes scientific sense. The researchers carefully note in the paper that moral disgust is outside the mandate of the FDS. The disgust starts in your thinking brain, not your animal instincts. ![]() If you saw a prepared food on a plate and didn’t know that it was some kind of meat you believe is culturally or religiously taboo, you wouldn’t be likely to see and experience physical disgust cues like bad smells or textures. This, the researchers explain, is moral disgust rather than more visceral or evolutionary disgust. One issue that came up for me while taking the test is that disgust is very contextual and cultural at times. Evolutionary scientists believe disgust is a favored quality over the generations, because choosing not to eat food that smells or looks or feels a certain way can “prevent the ingestion of potentially noxious and/or pathogen-laden substances.” The paper summarizes the overall conclusions of research on food disgust to date. The FDS is a self-report measure that enables the assessment of an individual’s emotional disposition to react with disgust to certain food-related (offensive) stimuli.” Thus, we developed and validated the Food Disgust Scale (FDS) through a series of five studies. One problem is that no food-specific disgust scale is available. In a 2017 paper cited by the IDRlabs quiz, Hartmann and Siegrist explain their motivation in devising a “food disgust scale” (FDS): “The function of disgust as a pathogen avoidance promoter in the food domain is not well understood. Try This Brain Teaser: Which Cup Will Fill First?.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |